samanvayadrusti@gmail.com PAY ROYALTY AS relief from Material strangulations. BANK ACCOUNT NUMBERS :(1) ANDHRA BANK AC.NO.001210021050036 IFSC CODE:ANDB0001255 (2) STATE BANK OF HYDERABAD AC NO.62340171658 IFSC CODE: SBHY0020074 NAME: ANJANI RAVISHANKAR PILLA
Tuesday, 22 April 2014
Monday, 21 April 2014
If Lord Rama is my father, my mother is Seethamma, I and my brother are sons of Rama and Seetha for consideration.
Yours truthfully
Dharmaswaroopulu
Maharajashri Anjani Ravishankar Pilla
Office of Dharmaswaroopam
Hyderabad
Sunday, 20 April 2014
నేను ప్రజలలోకి వెళ్ళడం వలన అనేక సంస్కారములు జరిగి, యువతీ యువకులకు నూతన ఉత్సాహం, ప్రేరణ కలుగుతుంది అని గ్రహించండి, నా వ్యవహార కార్యాలయము లో సిబ్బంది పెట్టుకొని సమాచారం విస్తారముగా ఇస్తాను. కధ తయారు చేసుకొని, సినిమా ఎలా తీయ దలచానో మీ వద్దకు వచ్చి వివరిస్తాను, అందుకు కనీస చేయూత మీకు ఎంత తోస్తే అంత అడ్వాన్సు వెంటనే ఇప్పించండి, మీ బావ గారిని సినిమా నిర్మాణం లోకి రమ్మని నేను ధర్మస్వరూపం గా కోరుతున్నాను, మీరు దైర్యం ఇవ్వడం వలన కాన్ఫిడన్సు పెరిగి, ధర్మస్వరూపంగా నన్ను నేను నేలబెట్టికొనే ప్రయత్నంలో, మీ ద్వారా మంచి సినిమా లోకానికి ఇవ్వగలము అని గ్రహించండి.
కొన్ని అనివార్య కారణాలు వలన ఈ సినిమా చూడలేదు మీ తో కలసి చూదాం అనుకొంటున్నాను
సమన్వయ దృష్టి
మహేష్ బాబు బాగున్నారా, నేను చెప్పేది సూటి గ్రహించి ముందుకు రండి, సృష్టి నన్ను ఒక్క గాని ఒక్క మగాడిగా ఎందుకు గుర్తించిందో గ్రహించండి. ఒక గొప్ప వాడిని ఒక గొప్పవాడే అర్ధం చేసుకోగలడు, ఒక మహారాజుని ఇంకో మహారాజే అర్ధం చేసుకోగలడు, దేవుడిని దేవుడే అర్ధం చేసుకోగలడు, సత్యానికి సత్యమే తోడు అని గ్రహించండి. ధర్మస్వరూపం గా అందరికోసం ఆలోచించేవాడిని అని గ్రహించండి. నేను ఇప్పుడు సామాన్యుడిగా ఉన్నాను కాబట్టి, నన్ను అర్ధం చేసుకోవడం చాలా కష్టం, కావున నేను చెప్పినట్లు ఒక్కో అడుగు ముందుకు వేస్తే మెల్లగా మార్గం అందరికి అర్ధవంతముగా మారుతుంది, నా దర్సకత్వంలో ఒక సినిమా చేద్దాం ముందుకు రండి. మీ భావ గారు అయిన గౌరవనీయులు గల్లా జయవర్ధన్ గారిని నిర్మాతగా అవతారం ఎత్తి, వారి నిర్మాణ సారధ్యంలో మీరు హీరోగా నా దర్సకత్వం లో ఒక సినిమా తీయుటకు ముందుకు రండి, నాకు అసులు ఏమి లేక అడుగుతున్నాను, నా మనసుకు తగ్గటు కనీసం బ్రతికితే నాలో గొప్పతనం ఉపయోగపడి మానవజాతికి నూతనత్వాన్ని ఇస్తుంది అని నమ్మండి, మీ సినిమాల తో బాటు ఇతర హీరోల సినిమాలో కూడా ఏక కాలం లో నా సొంతం వలే పలకగాలిగినాను అంటే, నా మొత్తం బలం ఎంతో అర్ధం చేసుకోండి, ఈ విషయములో మీ తండ్రి గారి తో ఒక సారి చర్చించి అనుకూలించండి, ఇక ఎవరి మాట వినకండి. ఒక కొడుకికి తండ్రి, తల్లి కంటే శ్రేయోభిలాషి ఎవరూ ఉండరు, ఈ లోటు ఎంత తీవ్రమైనదో, ముఖ్యంగా మన ఆత్మ గౌరవం, మనకి మాత్రమే సొంతమైన గొప్పతనమును ఉపయోగించుకోవలసి వచ్చినప్పుడు, ఆ ఆనందాన్ని పంచుకోవడానికి తండ్రి తల్లి కనీస అవసరం. కావున నా విషయం లో మీరు ఇంక ఎవరి మాట వినకండి, సూటిగా ఒక మహారాజుగారికి ధర్మం పరిపాలనకు చేయుతన ఇస్తున్నారు అని భావించండి, నా చుట్టూ స్వార్ధపరులు నన్ను ఆసిస్తూ నన్ను అసులు పటించుకోవడం లేదు అంటే నాకు ఎంత అన్యాయం చేస్తున్నారో కూడా వారికీ తెలియడం లేదు, పేరు, డబ్బే కదా అనుకొంటున్నారు, వాటికీ కూడా ఆధారం ఏమిటి అని ఎవరూ గ్రహించడం లేదు. వచ్చే సంవత్సరం మీ సహకారం, పవన్ కళ్యాణ్ గారు, రాజమౌళి గారి యొక్క ప్రత్యెక సహకారముతో నన్ను నేను అన్ని విధముల నిరూపించుకొని, న్యాయస్థానంలో కూడా కనీస దృవీకరణ పొంది, మహారాజుగా ప్రపంచానికి అందుతాను అని గ్రహించండి, నా వివాహము కూడా అమ్మాయిని పది మందిలో స్వయంవరం ద్వారా ఎన్నుకొని, మీ అందరి సహకారంతో ఒక ఈ వెంటి లా జరగాలి అని కోరుకొనుచున్నాను. వివాహం నేను కోరిన పద్దతిలో జరగాలి అప్పుడే అది లోక కళ్యాణం అవుతుంది, నేను రాముడు అంతటి వాడిని, అమ్మాయి సీత అవుతుంది అని గ్రహించగలరు. నేను జగత్గురువుతో సమానము నన్ను నిర్లక్ష్యం చేయడం, మానవత్వానికి మంచికి అనవసరమైన నష్టం జరుగుతుంది అని గ్రహించండి. మొదట హిందువులు గ్రహిస్తే, ఇతర మతస్తులకు కూడా ఒక మాటే సర్వం అని చెప్పవచ్చును) మీ బావగారు దగ్గర నుండి గాని, ఇతర నిర్మాత ఎవరి వద్ద నుండి అయిన నాకు వీలు అయినంత అడ్వాన్సు ఇప్పించండి, నేను ఎవరిని అయినా బ్యాంకు కతా లో వేయమని అడుగుతున్నాను, ఏవిధముగా మోసం చేయకుండా, పారదర్సకంగా ముందుకు వెళ్ళాలి అనే నా పద్దతి ని అర్ధం చేసుకోండి. ధర్మస్వరూపం గా ముందుకు వస్తున్న నన్ను ఇతరులతో పోల్చకండి, నా వ్యవహారం చరిత్రాత్మకం అని గ్రహించండి. ఇప్పుడు అడ్వాన్సు ఇప్పిస్తే, ఇల్లు కొనుకొన్ని, మా అమ్మ అమ్మగారిని నా దగ్గర పెట్టుకొంటే నాకు కనీస దైర్యం ( మా వూర్లో నాకు సెంటు భూమి కూడా లేదు అని గ్రహించండి) ఉంటుంది. దైవసాక్షాత్కారం పొందిన నన్ను ఏ విధముగా అనుమానించకండి, నన్ను మీ వంటి వారు గ్రహించకపోవడం వలన, మీడియా, నన్ను దర్శించిన వ్యవసాయ శాస్త్రవేత్తలు కూడా ఇప్పటికి నిర్లక్ష్యంగా తీసుకొంటూ, ఒక జగద్గురువు అనగా శ్రీ కృష్ణుడు అంశగా పరిణమించిన నన్ను ఒక్క పూట కూడా నిర్లక్ష్యం చేయకూడదు, నేను ప్రజలలోకి వెళ్ళడం వలన అనేక సంస్కారములు జరిగి, యువతీ యువకులకు నూతన ఉత్సాహం, ప్రేరణ కలుగుతుంది అని గ్రహించండి, నా వ్యవహార కార్యాలయము లో సిబ్బంది పెట్టుకొని సమాచారం విస్తారముగా ఇస్తాను. కధ తయారు చేసుకొని, సినిమా ఎలా తీయ దలచానో మీ వద్దకు వచ్చి వివరిస్తాను, అందుకు కనీస చేయూత మీకు ఎంత తోస్తే అంత అడ్వాన్సు వెంటనే ఇప్పించండి, మీ బావ గారిని సినిమా నిర్మాణం లోకి రమ్మని నేను ధర్మస్వరూపం గా కోరుతున్నాను, మీరు దైర్యం ఇవ్వడం వలన కాన్ఫిడన్సు పెరిగి, ధర్మస్వరూపంగా నన్ను నేను నేలబెట్టికొనే ప్రయత్నంలో, మీ ద్వారా మంచి సినిమా లోకానికి ఇవ్వగలము అని గ్రహించండి. నా గూర్చి ఎవరు చెప్పినా వినకండి, మన పది మంది హీరోల తెర మీద నటన కూడా సొంత మాటలు పాటలు వలె పలికినాను అంటే నన్ను నిసందేహంగా నమ్మండి. ఒక మహారాజుని లోకానికి అందించిన వారు అవుతారు అని గ్రహించండి. లేని వాడిని వంటరి వాడిని చేసి, అవమానించడం, స్వార్ధం కొద్ది మలుపుకొంటూ, మనిషిని పిచ్చివాడిలా చూస్తూ మనసుకి ప్రాధాన్యత ఇవ్వకపోవడం, అజ్ఞానం అని మీరు వంటనే గ్రహించి నంబర్ వన్ అని పించుకోండి, ఇది చరిత్ర, శుభోదయం, ధన్యవాదములు
ఇట్లు
ధర్మస్వరూపులు తమ ఆత్మీయులు
మహారాజశ్రీ అంజనీ రవిశంకర్ పిళ్ళా
వ్యవహార కార్యాలయము
హైదరాబాద్
Good wishes Balakrishna gaaru -- You are contesting from Hindoopur for Assembly -- it realy new change from the routine -- till now only persons from Kamma, reddy caste persons become CM of AndhraPradesh ---Even the leaders or some motivators are saying that there should not be no caste domination, but everything is under the control of selfish feeling of caste willingly or unwilligly --- for new change to the people I recomend to elevate a candidate to became CM from your party from Kaapu or other BC or SC caste persons instead of from Kamma or Reddy, if your party win please see to make this Change -- this is my recommendation to update our society for overall development and enthusiasm to everyone ---Dharmaswaroopam
Saturday, 19 April 2014
Akasam ante Manasu odugu veyadam ante sathyam tho munduku ravadam --- Plz take the truth then everthing will come to your concerned
Yours truthfully
Dharmaswaroopulu
Maharajashri Anjani Ravishankar Pilla
Office of the Dharmaswaroopam
Friday, 18 April 2014
I am seeking your friendship for longterm development of the society, let us do our best by gaining the support all other gradually -- take keen interest on me as #Dharmaswaroopam help me to give regular analysis to the public as part of your party agenda, I liked your agenda and vison. society needs regular keen taking, so dont allow me to waste my time, by receiving me and understanding me as rare personality needs to develop regularly -- help me to concentrate on my mind -- Let us do our best to this society by elevating good and dissolving bad -- Namaste Pawankalyan gaaru
Good morning happened before you, we have to shape according tothe word and its consequencess -- take thewitness available aned develop further you will be realized every day with keeness of heart felt feelings among individuals
one of the song emerged from Dharmaswaroopam 2003 along with other songs
yours truthfully
Dharmaswaroopulu
Maharajashri Anjani Ravishankar Pilla
Office of the Dharmaswaroopam
Hyderabad
మీ వంటి మేధావి గెలిచి పార్లమెంటు కు వెళ్ళడం చాలా మంచిది, అని నేను భావిస్తున్నాను, మీరు గెలవాలి అని కోరుకొంటున్నాను. ఎవరు గెలిచినా ఓడినా, నూతన ఉత్సాహముతో ముందుకు వెళ్ళుటకు, ఈ ప్రపంచాన్ని ఒక జండా క్రిందకు తీసుకొని వచ్చి నూతన ఆవిష్కారం చేసి నడిపించుటకు ధర్మస్వరూపం ఉన్నది అని గ్రహించండి.
సమన్వయ దృష్టి
గౌరవనీయులు డా జయ ప్రకాష్ నారాయణ గారు లోక్ సత్తా, మల్కాజ్గిరి పార్లమెంట్ స్థానం అబ్యర్ధులు వారికి ధర్మస్వరూపులు, మహారాజశ్రీ అంజనీ రవిశంకర్ పిళ్ళా వారు, వ్యవహార కార్యాలయం నుండి పంచుకోను దివ్య సందేశము గ్రహించగలరు.
ధర్మస్వరూపం అందరికి ఒక కల్ప వృక్షం వలె భూమి పైకి వచ్చినది అని గ్రహించండి, ఈ పరిణామం ద్వారా ఒక మహారాజు మహారాణి యొక్క పరిపాలన మొదలు అయినది.
ఎన్ని కలలో తెలుగు దేశం పార్టీకి ఎన్ని సీట్లు వస్తాయో, వై యస్ ఆర్ కాంగ్రెస్ పార్టీకి ఎన్ని సీట్లు వస్తాయో, కాంగ్రెస్ పార్టీకి ఎన్ని సీట్లు వస్తాయో, మీ పార్టీ కి ఎన్ని సీట్లు వస్తాయో నేను ఇప్పుడు చెప్పలేను, మీ వంటి మేధావి గెలిచి పార్లమెంటు కు వెళ్ళడం చాలా మంచిది, అని నేను భావిస్తున్నాను, మీరు గెలవాలి అని కోరుకొంటున్నాను. ఎవరు గెలిచినా ఓడినా, నూతన ఉత్సాహముతో ముందుకు వెళ్ళుటకు, ఈ ప్రపంచాన్ని ఒక జండా క్రిందకు తీసుకొని వచ్చి నూతన ఆవిష్కారం చేసి నడిపించుటకు ధర్మస్వరూపం ఉన్నది అని గ్రహించండి. ధన్యవాదములు
ఇట్లు
ధర్మస్వరూపులు
మహారాజశ్రీ అంజనీ రవిశంకర్ పిళ్ళా వారి
వ్యవహార కార్యాలయము
హైదరాబాద్
గౌరవనీయులు డా జయ ప్రకాష్ నారాయణ గారు లోక్ సత్తా, మల్కాజ్గిరి పార్లమెంట్ స్థానం అబ్యర్ధులు వారికి ధర్మస్వరూపులు, మహారాజశ్రీ అంజనీ రవిశంకర్ పిళ్ళా వారు, వ్యవహార కార్యాలయం నుండి పంచుకోను దివ్య సందేశము గ్రహించగలరు.
ధర్మస్వరూపం అందరికి ఒక కల్ప వృక్షం వలె భూమి పైకి వచ్చినది అని గ్రహించండి, ఈ పరిణామం ద్వారా ఒక మహారాజు మహారాణి యొక్క పరిపాలన మొదలు అయినది.
ఎన్ని కలలో తెలుగు దేశం పార్టీకి ఎన్ని సీట్లు వస్తాయో, వై యస్ ఆర్ కాంగ్రెస్ పార్టీకి ఎన్ని సీట్లు వస్తాయో, కాంగ్రెస్ పార్టీకి ఎన్ని సీట్లు వస్తాయో, మీ పార్టీ కి ఎన్ని సీట్లు వస్తాయో నేను ఇప్పుడు చెప్పలేను, మీ వంటి మేధావి గెలిచి పార్లమెంటు కు వెళ్ళడం చాలా మంచిది, అని నేను భావిస్తున్నాను, మీరు గెలవాలి అని కోరుకొంటున్నాను. ఎవరు గెలిచినా ఓడినా, నూతన ఉత్సాహముతో ముందుకు వెళ్ళుటకు, ఈ ప్రపంచాన్ని ఒక జండా క్రిందకు తీసుకొని వచ్చి నూతన ఆవిష్కారం చేసి నడిపించుటకు ధర్మస్వరూపం ఉన్నది అని గ్రహించండి. ధన్యవాదములు
ఇట్లు
ధర్మస్వరూపులు
మహారాజశ్రీ అంజనీ రవిశంకర్ పిళ్ళా వారి
వ్యవహార కార్యాలయము
హైదరాబాద్
Happy blessed Good Friday Nagarjuna gaaru -- communicate with me through mymail for important decisions related to the human socety -- All most all the films songs of films since 1999 and many dialogues expressed through Dharmaswaroopam as on, note and update and appropritate with me dont waste time on the untruthfull way of selfish nerrow feelings some of Telugu media persons supported bythe selfish witness persons and film personalities plz come out of nerrow feelings as one of the good and my favourate hero Mr Nagarjuna gaaru
Bhoothnadh Returns or Ominipresent or Sarvantharyami -- as Dharmaswaroopam for regeneration and reorganisation --- Inviting for interpretation from Telugu, Hindi and English Pandits and Proff and other Educated persons of Indian society and other country philosophical and literature persons
సమన్వయ దృష్టి
గౌరవనీయులు అయిన అమితాబ్ బచన్, ప్రఖ్యాత హిందీ సినిమా నటులు, ముంబై వారికి తమ ఆత్మీయులు ధర్మస్వరూపులు మహారాజశ్రీ అంజనీ రవిశంకర్ పిళ్ళా వారు వ్యవహార కార్యాలయం నుండి ధర్మ సంస్థానార్ధం పంచుకొని దివ్య సందేశం గ్రహించగలరు.
భూత నాధుడు సర్వాంతర్యామి అనగా పరమేశ్వరడు అని అర్ధం గా భావించి, అన్ని రూపాలలో అన్ని స్థానాలలో తన అయ్యి ఉన్నాడు అని తమరి ద్వారా యావత్త భారత జాతికి, ప్రపంచ ప్రజలకు తెలియజేసుకోనుచున్నాను.
మీ పేరు తీసుకొని నా ద్వారా వచ్చిన పాటలలో ఒక్కటి
తరువాత మీ అబ్బాయి గారి సినిమా లో వచ్చిన పాట ఒక్కటి గ్రహించగలరు.
ఈ విదముగా మీ సంభదించిన ఏక్ రేహ్మి బి రేహంపత్తే అనే ఒక పాప్ సాంగ్ ఒకటి కూడా నా ద్వారా వ్యక్తము అయినది. మీ అబ్బాయి గారు, గారు మీరు కలసి ఒక పాటలో డాన్సు చేస్తారు అని చెప్పినాను. ఇదే విధముగా తెలుగులో పది మంది హీరోల పాటలు, టీవి సీరియల్ టైటిల్ సాంగ్స్, నాలుగు రాజకీయ పార్టీల సమీక్ష, ఉగ్రవాద దాడులు, సునామి వంటి ఉపద్రవములు ఒక్క అల్లేక వాలే నేనే కాలాన్ని ధర్మాన్ని అని ప్రకటించ బడినవి, అన్ని మతాలకు కులాలకు సంభందించినవి ఏక కాలం లో ఒక్క మనిషి మాటగా వ్యక్తము అగుట ఒక నూతన యుగ ప్రారంభం అని గ్రహించగలరు. తరువాత అశ్వర్య బచన్ గారు నటించిన, రోబో సినిమా లోని పాటలు, సంభాషణలు నా ద్వారా 2003 లోనే వ్యక్తము అయినవి గ్రహించగలరు
ఇట్లు
తమ ఆత్మీయులు
ధర్మస్వరూపులు
మహారాజశ్రీ అంజనీ రవిశంకర్ పిళ్ళా వారు
వ్యవహార కార్యాలయము
The Five Lessons of Good Friday--you have a prayerful Good Friday,
SAMANVAYA DRUSTI
Songs and scenes emerged from #Dharmaswaroopam 2003 from the film Shantisandesham
The Five Lessons of Good Friday--you have a prayerful Good Friday
The sufferings and death of Jesus, which Christians commemorate on Good Friday, may seem far removed from our everyday lives. After all, it is almost impossible to imagine that anyone reading this essay will ever be crucified. (On the other hand, persecution of Christians continues in many parts of the world even today.) So what can the story of Jesus's crucifixion, as recorded in the Gospels almost 2,000 years ago, teach us about our own lives?
One. Physical suffering is part of life.
Unlike philosophies or belief systems that suggest that suffering is more or less an illusion, Jesus says this from the cross: suffering is real. As a fully human person, Jesus suffered. On Good Friday, he was beaten, tortured and then nailed to a cross, the most agonizing way the Roman authorities had devised for capital punishment. There, according to the Gospels, he hung for three hours. Victims of crucifixion died either from loss of blood or, more commonly, asphyxiation, as the weight of their bodies pulled on their wrists, compressed their lungs and made breathing impossible. Jesus's life, like any human life, included physical suffering, and an immense amount of it on Good Friday.
But even before Good Friday, Jesus suffered physically, because he had a human body like yours and mine. Growing up in the tiny town of Nazareth, and later as an adult traveling throughout Galilee and Judea, Jesus likely had headaches, got the flu, sprained an ankle or two, and perhaps even broke a bone--in an era of lousy sanitation and only the most primitive of "medical" knowledge. As a fully human person with a fully human body, he suffered physical aches and pains. Good Friday was not the only day he suffered physically.
Two. Emotional suffering is part of life.
When Christians speak of Jesus's suffering on Good Friday, they tend to focus on his physical trials. Many Early Renaissance artists, for example, depicted that agony in gruesome detail, as a way of reminding Christians of what their Savior underwent. But Jesus's "Agony on the Cross" included emotional sufferings as well. In these emotions we can see further intersections with our lives.
To begin with, Jesus of Nazareth felt a deep sense of abandonment. How could he not? All of his disciples had abandoned him before the crucifixion, save for a few faithful women and the Apostle John. Peter, his closest friend, denied even knowing him. Moreover, Jesus felt the suffering of betrayal: another close friend, Judas, betrayed him outright. How that must have weighed on his heart as he hung on the cross.
Finally, Jesus likely knew the crushing disappointment of seeing his great work seemingly come to an end. That is, he may have felt like a failure. While it's almost impossible to know what was going on in Jesus's mind on Good Friday (save for the few words he utters before Pontius Pilate and while on the cross) it's not unreasonable to think that he lamented the end of his public ministry.
Now, here we enter some complicated theological terrain. On the one hand, since Jesus had a human consciousness, he would not have known what was going to happen. On the other hand, since he had a fully divine consciousness he would have.
So, on the one hand, it is possible that Jesus knew that the Resurrection was coming. (By the way, for anyone who thinks that this "lessens" his suffering, think of being in a dentist's chair: knowing it will be over soon does not remove the pain.) In fact, Jesus predicts the Resurrection at various points in the Gospel. But it is also possible that Jesus the fully human one may have been surprised on Easter Sunday, when he was raised from the dead.
Thus, as he hung on the cross, Jesus might have mourned the end of his great project--into which he had poured his heart and soul--the end to his hopes for all his followers, the end to all that he tried to do for humanity. And so he says, "It is finished."
Three. Suffering is not the result of sin.
Sometimes it is. If we do something sinful or make immoral decisions that lead to our suffering, we could say that this suffering comes as the result of sin. But most of the time, particularly when it comes to illness and other tragedies, it is assuredly not. If you still harbor any doubts about that, think about this: Jesus, the sinless one, suffered a great deal. He was not being "punished for his sins."
This idea was more or less common in Jesus's time. In the Gospel of John, when Jesus meets a man who was born blind, his disciples ask, "Rabbi, who sinned, this man or his parents, that he was born blind?" Jesus answered bluntly. "Neither this man nor his parents sinned."
Sadly, this attitude is still common today. Recently, friend living with an operable cancer received a visit from friends she knew from her church. They callously told her that they felt her illness was the work of "Satan." In other words, sin had entered her life and she was being punished. When she told me this, I reminded her not only of the Gospel of John, but Jesus's own suffering.
Four. Jesus is fully human.
Christians believe that Jesus Christ is fully human and fully divine. Now this is, as theologians like to say, a mystery, something that we will never be able to fully comprehend. But belief in this is essential for Christian belief. Besides, attempts to paint Jesus as either only human or only divine simply don't square with the Jesus we encounter in the Gospels. We read of him both weeping at the death of his friend Lazarus (hardly something that the classic Aristotelian or Platonic God would do), and we also see him heal the sick, still storms, and raise people from the dead (hardly something that people expected of religious figures in first-century Galilee and Judea, or modern-day anywhere today).
In the events of his Passion, we see Jesus's humanity on display. On Holy Thursday, in the Garden of Gethsemane Jesus says, "Remove this cup." In other words, I don't want to die. Only when he realizes that it is his Father's will that he undergo death, does he assent. But initially the human one expresses, in the bluntest language possible, that he does not wish to die. Later, also revealing his humanity, he utters a great cry from the Cross, "My God, my God, why have you abandoned me?" I don't think Jesus ever despaired--to my mind, someone in union with the Father would not be able to do that--but he clearly struggled and, at that moment, felt a profound sense of God's absence. Here is his humanity on full display.
This is often a consolation to people who pray to Jesus, the risen one in heaven. Why? Because he understands their humanity. He gets it. Christians do not have a God who cannot understand them, because God endured all the things that we do.
Five. Suffering is not the last word.
The message of Good Friday is incomplete without Easter. The story of the passion is not simply of a man being brutally tortured, nailed to a cross and executed by the Romans. It is the story of a man who turns himself fully over to the Father's will, trusts that something new will come out of this offering, and receives the astonishing gift of new life. The message of Easter is not only the Christ is risen, not only the suffering is not the last word, not only the God gives new life, but this: Nothing is impossible with God.
So may you have a prayerful Good Friday, but, more important, may you have a happy Easter.
by
farwarded by
Yours truthfully
Anjani Ravishanker Pilla
Office of the Dharmaswaroopam
Hyderabad
Thursday, 17 April 2014
Wednesday, 16 April 2014
Many films of Mahesh babu since 1999 onwards are emerged from samanvaya Drusti or coordinated vision of Dharmaswaroopam -
Mahesh Babu`s Rs 24 Cr Remuneration!
Source visit http://www.Telugu365.com for more interesting blogs.
Reading the headline might make you scratch
your head with doubt whether Mahesh Babu is worth that much. Well, our
prince is busy entertaining a long list of brand endorsements and
analysts who are following his movements in the brand market have come
up with statistics.
A noted analyst said “Right now, Mahesh is charging Rs 2 crores for a
period of two years. So far, he has companies like Univercell,
Navratan, Idea, Vivel, Jos Alukkas, Provogue, Amrutanjan, Thumbs Up in
his kitty and latest, he has added Gillette in his bag.”The analyst added “Currently, he is in talks with few more companies and the total can touch 12 companies. So, if from each company he charges Rs 2 crores for 3 years, he makes a cool Rs 24 crores. Maximum twice or thrice they will be shooting for the ads and the duration of the shoot is hardly for a day or two. That way he is making better money in ad field than films.”
Mahesh babu pay me my royalty as Dharmaswaroopam which is boon granted to this world, and enble me to take my further responsibility further , i have to set up house and office to give regular message to the public. or see to pay some advance to direct you for one movie from any producer, i will come to you as myself as story on your identification in way i am coming forward to introduce to the world. the movie is going to be a great informative. according to my present situation of mind, i need minimum care from you along with other film personality to enable me to give maximum to the society, thank you my dear friend.
Yours friend
Dharmaswaroopulu
Maharajasri Anjani Ravishankar Pilla
office of Dharmaswaroopam
Hyderabad
Monday, 14 April 2014
Common, Persisting Myths About Muslims --- Distributed by the office of Dharmaswaroopam of Dharmaswaroopulu Maharajasri Anjani Ravishankar pilla vaaru
SHANKAR GOPALAKRISHNAN
As the 2014 elections begin, the time has
come again to state the obvious. In the context of massive propaganda
campaigns, the subtle use of stereotypes, and the fact that both the
Western and the Indian media share certain basic biases, many people end
up believing in a range of myths about the adherents of the world’s
second largest religion. This is a quick attempt at exposing those
myths.
In reality the majority of Muslim majority countries in the world are secular. Several large examples include Turkey, Mali, Syria, Niger, and Kazakhstan. Despite having Islam as ‘state religion’, Bangladesh’s government is also secular in law. The same is true of many other countries. Only six countries in the world claim to use Islam as the basis of their law making – and their total population is roughly the same as the population of Indonesia, Turkey and Kazakhstan combined. In other words, the vast majority of Muslim majority countries are secular, and the vast majority of Muslims live under secular governments.
It is also not true that Muslim organisations engage in the most violence in India. Between 2005 and 2014, as per the South Asia Terrorism Portal, twice as many people were killed in ‘terrorist incidents’ by Northeastern militant organisations and “left wing extremism”. These are all non-Muslim organisations, and the largest Northeastern organisation in this period (ULFA) has a mostly Hindu, upper caste leadership.
Besides, the definition of “terrorism” that the government uses is contradictory. Killing twenty people by a bomb blast is considered terrorism, but the killing of thousands of people in 1984 or more than a thousand people in Gujarat in 2002 (or, for that matter, the killing of 40 people in Muzaffarnagar, 68 people in Orissa in 2008, etc. etc.) are not. All riots involve planning, stockpiling of weapons and systematic attacks. Why then are they not considered terrorism?
Israel’s role in propping up Hamas to counter the PLO is also well known. This reached its height in the 1980s with the war in Afghanistan, with the US bankrolling and training the people who later founded Al Qaeda. It was during this period as well that the US financed and supported the Zia regime in Pakistan in its “Islamisation” drive. The current strength of the Islamic fundamentalist movement in the Middle East is a result of American strategy, which involved finishing off all leftist resistance while tolerating and encouraging Islamic fundamentalism.
Above all, to repeat the key point, Islamic fundamentalism is a political phenomenon created by a particular history – just like Hindutva, Christian fundamentalism and every other form of right wing movement. The myth of the inherently fundamentalist Muslim owes a lot to European mythmaking around the Crusades and subsequent efforts to prop up their empire in India. But people continue to recycle colonial self-justifications as if they are true.
The reason for this is simple – the only way to convince people to commit inhuman atrocities against other people is to make them believe that they are “defending themselves” or “paying back.” The sheer inhumanity of talking about “retaliation” is obvious. Would those who claim “Hindus only retaliate” be comfortable if a Bihari militia were to massacre Maharashtrians as “retaliation” for attacks by the MNS and the Shiv Sena? Would they accept if Northeastern armed organisations carried out massacres of Delhiites in “retaliation” for atrocities and racism against Northeasterners in the capital? It is a mark of how low we have come as a society that so many people go around mouthing these slogans today, as if gangrape and massacres can ever be justified by “retaliation” and “self-defense.”
Every religion has groups that urge conflict with other religions, and holy texts in every religion contain things that endorse atrocities (just look at the what the Manu Smriti says about women and Dalits, or the Old Testament of the Bible says about massacres of non-Jews). This does not mean that followers of those religions follow those texts literally. The vast majority of Muslims, like the vast majority of Hindus, Christians, or any other group, have never killed anyone and never will.
If anything, in today’s cities the idea of “Muslims all live together” has been created by discrimination against them and them being forced to live in particular ghettos. Meanwhile, in voting, people worry about their own physical safety; just as a Bihari will not vote for a Shiv Sena candidate, most Muslims would not vote for the BJP. This is, once again, common sense. A party which has built itself around calling you foreigners, terrorists and anti-nationals is not likely to win your vote.
Similarly, in a study published in the Economic and Political Weekly in 2007, the authors responded to 548 job advertisements from private sector companies with three identical applications – one with a high caste Hindu name, one with a Dalit name, and one with a Muslim name. Even though the applications were otherwise identical, the Dalit name was approximately one third less likely to get called for an interview, and the Muslim name was two thirds less likely. In both the public and the private sectors, Muslims are denied opportunities across the board.

As for Muslim men marrying many wives, it is blindingly obvious that this can make no difference to population growth, since if one Muslim man has two wives, that means some other man will have no wife (given that the populations of men and women are roughly equal). Meanwhile, the NFHS found (in the only survey that looked at this) that approximately 5.8% of Hindu men have multiple wives, while only 5.73% of Muslim men do.
In short, it’s simple: Muslims are human beings, with as much diversity and free thinking as any other group of people. In this climate of intense hate-mongering against Muslims, it’s necessary to reject these racist myths and instead stand up for a world that values human dignity.–kafila.org
Myth: ‘Muslim’ countries are never secular. Muslims do not tolerate minorities in ‘their’ countries but demand minority rights in other countries.
The world’s largest Muslim majority country is Indonesia (total population approximately 25 crores, larger than Pakistan). Indonesia is a secular democracy. Indeed, its population is almost a mirror image of India’s – 88% Muslim, 9% Christian, 3% Hindu, 2% Buddhist, etc. (as compared to India, which has a population that is 80% Hindu, 13.4% Muslim, 2.3% Christian, etc.) Indonesia’s national slogan is “Unity in Diversity.” Yes, Indonesia has occasional riots and bomb blasts, but so does India.In reality the majority of Muslim majority countries in the world are secular. Several large examples include Turkey, Mali, Syria, Niger, and Kazakhstan. Despite having Islam as ‘state religion’, Bangladesh’s government is also secular in law. The same is true of many other countries. Only six countries in the world claim to use Islam as the basis of their law making – and their total population is roughly the same as the population of Indonesia, Turkey and Kazakhstan combined. In other words, the vast majority of Muslim majority countries are secular, and the vast majority of Muslims live under secular governments.
Myth: Not all Muslims may be terrorists, but most terrorists are Muslims.
Even if we accept the government’s definition of who is a terrorist in India, this is entirely untrue. In India, less than a third of the organisations banned as “terrorist” under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act are Muslim organisations. Internationally, the group that engaged in the most suicide bombings in the world was the LTTE in Sri Lanka – a militantly atheist group whose members are mostly of Hindu and Christian origin.It is also not true that Muslim organisations engage in the most violence in India. Between 2005 and 2014, as per the South Asia Terrorism Portal, twice as many people were killed in ‘terrorist incidents’ by Northeastern militant organisations and “left wing extremism”. These are all non-Muslim organisations, and the largest Northeastern organisation in this period (ULFA) has a mostly Hindu, upper caste leadership.
Besides, the definition of “terrorism” that the government uses is contradictory. Killing twenty people by a bomb blast is considered terrorism, but the killing of thousands of people in 1984 or more than a thousand people in Gujarat in 2002 (or, for that matter, the killing of 40 people in Muzaffarnagar, 68 people in Orissa in 2008, etc. etc.) are not. All riots involve planning, stockpiling of weapons and systematic attacks. Why then are they not considered terrorism?
Myth: Muslims have always been fundamentalists and are ‘more religious’ than followers of other religions.
Recent history shows that this is a lie, and also exposes where current “Muslim fundamentalism” comes from. Just forty to sixty years ago, in most of the major regions of the world with high Islamic populations – Indonesia, the Middle East, north Africa – the strongest political forces were secular leftists. This took many forms: the Indonesian Communist Party, the Nasserite and Baa’thist regimes in Egypt, Syria and Iraq, the Iranian government of Mohammed Mossadegh, etc. In these countries, especially in the Middle East, it was the United States and its client states (such as Saudi Arabia) that sponsored, financed and armed right wing and religious fundamentalist organisations, precisely in order to counter the strength of the secular leftists whom they opposed.Israel’s role in propping up Hamas to counter the PLO is also well known. This reached its height in the 1980s with the war in Afghanistan, with the US bankrolling and training the people who later founded Al Qaeda. It was during this period as well that the US financed and supported the Zia regime in Pakistan in its “Islamisation” drive. The current strength of the Islamic fundamentalist movement in the Middle East is a result of American strategy, which involved finishing off all leftist resistance while tolerating and encouraging Islamic fundamentalism.
Above all, to repeat the key point, Islamic fundamentalism is a political phenomenon created by a particular history – just like Hindutva, Christian fundamentalism and every other form of right wing movement. The myth of the inherently fundamentalist Muslim owes a lot to European mythmaking around the Crusades and subsequent efforts to prop up their empire in India. But people continue to recycle colonial self-justifications as if they are true.
Myth: Muslims always start violence. Hindus only ‘retaliate’ or ‘act in self defence’.
Every single group that has ever engaged in mass killings has claimed to be ‘retaliating’ or ‘defending themselves’.’ The September 11 attacks in the US were justified as “retaliation” for the killing of lakhs of people in Iraq (through sanctions) and in Palestine by the US and Israel. If you believe the emails being sent before the Delhi and Ahmedabad bomb blasts in 2008, the blasts were “retaliation” for police atrocities and the massacre of Muslims in Gujarat. In 2008 Christians were massacred in Orissa in “retaliation” for the killing of a VHP leader. Going back further in history, the Nazis justified the Kristallnacht- their first state-sponsored riot against Jews, in which thousands of synagogues and homes were destroyed – by claiming it was “retaliation” for the murder of a German diplomat and necessary to ‘defend themselves’ against ‘international Jewry’.The reason for this is simple – the only way to convince people to commit inhuman atrocities against other people is to make them believe that they are “defending themselves” or “paying back.” The sheer inhumanity of talking about “retaliation” is obvious. Would those who claim “Hindus only retaliate” be comfortable if a Bihari militia were to massacre Maharashtrians as “retaliation” for attacks by the MNS and the Shiv Sena? Would they accept if Northeastern armed organisations carried out massacres of Delhiites in “retaliation” for atrocities and racism against Northeasterners in the capital? It is a mark of how low we have come as a society that so many people go around mouthing these slogans today, as if gangrape and massacres can ever be justified by “retaliation” and “self-defense.”
Myth: Hindus do not kill based on their religion. Only Muslims do, because their religion requires them to.
In Gujarat in 2002, in Delhi and other cities in 1984, in Bhagalpur in 1989, and in most other riots, the overwhelming majority of those who died were from minority communities (Muslims, Sikhs, etc.) Then we have the recent instances of bomb blasts by Hindutva organisations. The majority of the killers in all of these incidents were Hindus, and the organisations that drove the killings called on them to kill non-Hindus. Would it be accurate to say they killed because Hinduism required them to do so? No, clearly, in all those instances, the attackers and the organizers were political groups seeking political goals (and dressing them up as religious goals). This is exactly what far right Muslim groups do too.Every religion has groups that urge conflict with other religions, and holy texts in every religion contain things that endorse atrocities (just look at the what the Manu Smriti says about women and Dalits, or the Old Testament of the Bible says about massacres of non-Jews). This does not mean that followers of those religions follow those texts literally. The vast majority of Muslims, like the vast majority of Hindus, Christians, or any other group, have never killed anyone and never will.
Myth: Muslims are united and act together, while Hindus are divided and weak.
Every election study ever done has found that Muslims vote in the same manner as any other community votes – for facilities, on the basis of the candidate, whether they like a political party, etc. In practice also Muslims are no more united than any other group; they have internal divisions on religious, caste, gender, regional, language and countless other lines, just like any other community in India. If Muslims were “united”, one would expect that they would be represented well in Parliament. In fact, Muslim MPs constituted only 5.5% of the outgoing Lok Sabha, even though they are more than 13% of the population.If anything, in today’s cities the idea of “Muslims all live together” has been created by discrimination against them and them being forced to live in particular ghettos. Meanwhile, in voting, people worry about their own physical safety; just as a Bihari will not vote for a Shiv Sena candidate, most Muslims would not vote for the BJP. This is, once again, common sense. A party which has built itself around calling you foreigners, terrorists and anti-nationals is not likely to win your vote.
Myth: The government favours Muslims and pampers them.
On the contrary, official data indicates systematic discrimination against Muslims. The Sachar Committee found that availability of bus stops, roads, bank branches etc. is lower in Muslim majority areas, even when compared to nearby villages with a Hindu majority. Muslims on average received only 2/3 the loan amounts disbursed to other minorities. The proportion of Muslims living in pucca houses is lower than the general population, both in cities and in villages, even if compared to others at their level of poverty. Muslims form less than 3% of the IAS officers and 4% of IPS officers, even though their population is about 13% of the total. Overall, the Sachar Committee concluded that on average Muslims are at roughly the same socioeconomic level as Dalits and adivasis.Similarly, in a study published in the Economic and Political Weekly in 2007, the authors responded to 548 job advertisements from private sector companies with three identical applications – one with a high caste Hindu name, one with a Dalit name, and one with a Muslim name. Even though the applications were otherwise identical, the Dalit name was approximately one third less likely to get called for an interview, and the Muslim name was two thirds less likely. In both the public and the private sectors, Muslims are denied opportunities across the board.
Myth: But Hindus cannot buy land in Jammu and Kashmir!
Non-Kashmiris cannot buy land in J&K – just as non-Himachalis cannot buy land in Himachal Pradesh, outsiders cannot enter Nagaland without permission, non-Uttarakhandis can buy only small plots in Uttarakhand, etc. Many parts of India have these regulations to protect local populations. The issue has nothing to do with religion.Myth: The Muslim population is increasing faster than the Hindu population, especially because Muslim men can have many wives. Their aim is to become the majority.
The National Family Health Survey has found that young Muslim women have the same fertility rate as young Hindu women of the same economic level. The slightly higher growth rate for Muslims overall is due to the fact that, on average, Muslims are poorer than Hindus. Common sense would also indicate this. Kerala, which has a Muslim population of approximately 25%, also has the lowest population growth rate of any State in the country. Poverty and lack of facilities are far more important than religion in deciding how many children you have. The fertility rate of Muslims in States like Tamil Nadu and Kerala is far below that of Hindus in Uttar Pradesh, Bihar or Rajasthan, for instance.As for Muslim men marrying many wives, it is blindingly obvious that this can make no difference to population growth, since if one Muslim man has two wives, that means some other man will have no wife (given that the populations of men and women are roughly equal). Meanwhile, the NFHS found (in the only survey that looked at this) that approximately 5.8% of Hindu men have multiple wives, while only 5.73% of Muslim men do.
Myth: Muslims got ‘their’ country when Pakistan was created, now they should leave ‘our’ country.
The first active political leaders to talk of separate countries for Muslims and Hindus were those who would later be part of the Hindu Mahasabha. Bhai Paramanand, later president of the Mahasabha, demanded this in 1905. The demand for Pakistan did not emerge from the Muslim League until 1940, and then as well it was a political demand by a political party. Huge numbers of Muslims opposed the idea of Pakistan, including the biggest Islamic religious school in India – the Deoband seminary – and President of the Congress party, Maulana Azad, who was one of India’s greatest freedom fighters. The demand for Pakistan was a demand by a political party, not a demand by Muslims as a whole.In short, it’s simple: Muslims are human beings, with as much diversity and free thinking as any other group of people. In this climate of intense hate-mongering against Muslims, it’s necessary to reject these racist myths and instead stand up for a world that values human dignity.–kafila.org
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)














